<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://groups.google.com.vc/group/sci.math</id>
  <title type="text">sci.math Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  Mathematical discussions and pursuits.
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/sci.math/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="sci.math feed"/>
  <updated>2010-03-11T02:23:14Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://groups.google.com.vc" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Danny73</name>
  <email>fasttrac...@att.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-11T02:23:14Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.vc/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/bb595de5b40019c7/51384a9eda01dee0?show_docid=51384a9eda01dee0</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.vc/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/bb595de5b40019c7/51384a9eda01dee0?show_docid=51384a9eda01dee0"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Satisfying Cardons&#39; impossible quadratic equation.</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Rewriting my first quadratic example to conform &lt;br&gt; to the rest I am showing below --- &lt;br&gt; x^2 - 10x = - 40 &lt;br&gt; ------------------------------ ----- &lt;br&gt; x^2 - 10x = 40 - ((10/2)^2) = 15+ 40 = 55 &lt;br&gt; -x = ((sqrt((55*4)+2)) -2)/2 = 6.4498322128... + (10/2) = - &lt;br&gt; 11.4498322128... &lt;br&gt; -x^2 = ((((11.4498322128...*2)+2)^2) -2)/4 = - 154.49832212...
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>JSH</name>
  <email>jst...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-11T02:21:36Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.vc/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/4fc007bb1bd07f4c/5d040ca03d77448d?show_docid=5d040ca03d77448d</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.vc/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/4fc007bb1bd07f4c/5d040ca03d77448d?show_docid=5d040ca03d77448d"/>
  <title type="text">Re: JSH: Biggest mystery, pondering again hostility</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Twin primes proof follows with a short argument from the prime residue &lt;br&gt; axiom. &lt;br&gt; Actually I separated out the prime distribution, which makes for a &lt;br&gt; simpler twin primes probability calculation! &lt;br&gt; The prime distribution is NOT random, so there has been confusion when &lt;br&gt; it is mixed in with twin primes, like by working with the twin primes
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Arturo Magidin</name>
  <email>magi...@member.ams.org</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-11T02:07:54Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.vc/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/f3febeccd0421084/42abaa438f7efe27?show_docid=42abaa438f7efe27</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.vc/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/f3febeccd0421084/42abaa438f7efe27?show_docid=42abaa438f7efe27"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Good Point by JSH</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Fixing crossposting: &lt;br&gt; Somehow, this fails to seem like an argument for the proposition that &lt;br&gt; he did have a proof of the general case, despite you starting by &lt;br&gt; denying my statement to the contrary. &lt;br&gt; He made personal note that he had no reason to believe would ever &lt;br&gt; become public (it would not have become, but for his son publishing
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Inverse 19 mathematics</name>
  <email>hope9...@verizon.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-11T01:38:31Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.vc/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/25c24239687710c7/987d7519852ee166?show_docid=987d7519852ee166</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.vc/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/25c24239687710c7/987d7519852ee166?show_docid=987d7519852ee166"/>
  <title type="text">1.75 PRIMALITY DIVISOR , IS DESIGNED TO SELECT PRIME FROM NON PRIME IN THE 36SET SIEVE POSTED EARLIER</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  The 36 set sieve isolates all primes and pseudo primes, so far it &lt;br&gt; seems that this differentiates and we can build up the sets of primes &lt;br&gt; completly because all other numbers are sieved out. It is NOT a &lt;br&gt; primary sieve for primality, which may come. &lt;br&gt; Understand that we did not have a chance to thoroughly check this
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>harmony</name>
  <email>a...@hotmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-11T01:33:24Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.vc/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/2328f3fe4ab3daef/4850d2ad97ab9949?show_docid=4850d2ad97ab9949</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.vc/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/2328f3fe4ab3daef/4850d2ad97ab9949?show_docid=4850d2ad97ab9949"/>
  <title type="text">Re: *** *** Re: India - beggar nation, biggest recipient of foreign aid ever</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Which &amp;quot;he&amp;quot; are you talking about? &lt;br&gt; Quite frankly and after (I&#39;m retired now) a career in professional &lt;br&gt; science, including publishing in peer-reviewed journals in my &lt;br&gt; specialization, I can tell you that if you have a wacky-idea, it&#39;s going &lt;br&gt; to get rejected. I can also tell you that if you have a good idea, it
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Dann Corbit</name>
  <email>dcor...@connx.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-11T01:07:23Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.vc/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/a1550c4e544bea1a/c29292d43a233b20?show_docid=c29292d43a233b20</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.vc/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/a1550c4e544bea1a/c29292d43a233b20?show_docid=c29292d43a233b20"/>
  <title type="text">Re: JSH: Why fame is lame</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  In article &amp;lt;hn9d07$ee...@news.albasani.ne t&amp;gt;, nos...@invalid.com says... &lt;br&gt; Sometimes he says something that is true, but it was known centuries &lt;br&gt; ago. &lt;br&gt; So I will beat him to the punch: &lt;br&gt; I have discovered that counting numbers have something called a &lt;br&gt; successor if we add a unit to them and we will end up with a larger
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>mpc755</name>
  <email>mpc...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-11T01:03:05Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.vc/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/faba95ec4697f5c6/fbc1f184166f1ac9?show_docid=fbc1f184166f1ac9</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.vc/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/faba95ec4697f5c6/fbc1f184166f1ac9?show_docid=fbc1f184166f1ac9"/>
  <title type="text">Re: There is no “pull” of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  For a photon when the photon wave interacts with the detection screen &lt;br&gt; the photon collapses and is detected as a quantum of mather. The &lt;br&gt; ability of the photon to collapse and be detected as a quantum of &lt;br&gt; mather travels a single path. However, this path the photon &#39;particle&#39; &lt;br&gt; travel also consists of an associated aether wave which interference
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>BURT</name>
  <email>macromi...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-11T00:53:35Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.vc/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/faba95ec4697f5c6/9b78dba8f8eb17a9?show_docid=9b78dba8f8eb17a9</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.vc/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/faba95ec4697f5c6/9b78dba8f8eb17a9?show_docid=9b78dba8f8eb17a9"/>
  <title type="text">Re: There is no “pull” of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  But the wave for matter can go away at the dection screen. &lt;br&gt; Mitch Raemsch
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>BURT</name>
  <email>macromi...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-11T00:46:47Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.vc/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/faba95ec4697f5c6/68c57fc44c6aa76e?show_docid=68c57fc44c6aa76e</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.vc/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/faba95ec4697f5c6/68c57fc44c6aa76e?show_docid=68c57fc44c6aa76e"/>
  <title type="text">Re: There is no “pull” of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Push is the real thing. &lt;br&gt; Mitch Raemsch
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Frederick Williams</name>
  <email>frederick.willia...@tesco.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-11T00:31:54Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.vc/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/ec8f2cda950257d4/22a418b0e2135be0?show_docid=22a418b0e2135be0</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.vc/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/ec8f2cda950257d4/22a418b0e2135be0?show_docid=22a418b0e2135be0"/>
  <title type="text">Re: NEW SIMPLE PRIMALITY TEST FROM &quot;INVERSE 19 MATHEMATICS&quot;</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  If he was your friend you should know what his title was and how to &lt;br&gt; spell his name.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>harry</name>
  <email>nos...@invalid.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-11T00:25:29Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.vc/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/f3febeccd0421084/b50a665adf633508?show_docid=b50a665adf633508</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.vc/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/f3febeccd0421084/b50a665adf633508?show_docid=b50a665adf633508"/>
  <title type="text">Re: JSH: Depressing reality, prime reality</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Agree, caribou and fleas is good. &lt;br&gt; and Yes, Musatov is far more famous in higher circles, for far less &lt;br&gt; compedient work than JSH. &lt;br&gt; But we are comparing two Bozos in the Dark with squirt guns and weak minds.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>harry</name>
  <email>nos...@invalid.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-11T00:20:05Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.vc/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/a1550c4e544bea1a/ed7080b1cd55b548?show_docid=ed7080b1cd55b548</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.vc/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/a1550c4e544bea1a/ed7080b1cd55b548?show_docid=ed7080b1cd55b548"/>
  <title type="text">Re: JSH: Why fame is lame</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  that could be true, unless JSH states that he lies, but I don&#39;t think he &lt;br&gt; ever has said that, so this new Axiom holds. &lt;br&gt; The newly discovered but obvious, JSH Axiom =&amp;gt; JSH is ALWAYS lying.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>harry</name>
  <email>nos...@invalid.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-11T00:17:05Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.vc/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/f3febeccd0421084/312effdb8299c921?show_docid=312effdb8299c921</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.vc/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/f3febeccd0421084/312effdb8299c921?show_docid=312effdb8299c921"/>
  <title type="text">Re: JSH: Depressing reality, prime reality</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Nice site lyndon laroush and science
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Inverse 19 mathematics</name>
  <email>hope9...@verizon.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-11T00:08:34Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.vc/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/ed55447c24ae99ca/e7893579783c54a5?show_docid=e7893579783c54a5</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.vc/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/ed55447c24ae99ca/e7893579783c54a5?show_docid=e7893579783c54a5"/>
  <title type="text">Re: &quot; A TIME TO BE HUMBLE:&quot; INVERSE 19 MATHEMATICS OF THE 21ST CENTURY</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Mar 10, 6:04 pm, Inverse 19 mathematics &amp;lt;hope9...@verizon.net&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; TYPO -- Over 300 posts Scimath , not 30000. This mathematics was &lt;br&gt; introduced in another forum, that did not have the freedom, non &lt;br&gt; American
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Inverse 19 mathematics</name>
  <email>hope9...@verizon.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-11T00:04:53Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.vc/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/ed55447c24ae99ca/53765a3a9016171e?show_docid=53765a3a9016171e</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.vc/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/ed55447c24ae99ca/53765a3a9016171e?show_docid=53765a3a9016171e"/>
  <title type="text">&quot; A TIME TO BE HUMBLE:&quot; INVERSE 19 MATHEMATICS OF THE 21ST CENTURY</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Having said what is in the header, we feel humbled by our experiences &lt;br&gt; of the past 1 and a half years , starting out as novices , may be &lt;br&gt; still , but we have completed our missioon by solving the entire &lt;br&gt; structure of Mathematics, much of our record are in the 3000 or so &lt;br&gt; Recorded post , plus the first posts in another forum.
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
