Gmail Calendar Documents Web Reader more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
new numerical methods
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  5 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
arithmeticae  
View profile  
 More options Mar 10, 12:09 pm
Newsgroups: sci.math
From: arithmeticae <djes...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:09:53 EST
Local: Wed, Mar 10 2010 12:09 pm
Subject: new numerical methods
New numerical methods for computing roots at any convergence rate and by means of the most simple arithmetic:

http://domingogomez.web.officelive.com/rm.aspx

Regards,
Domingo G.


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Chip Eastham  
View profile  
 More options Mar 10, 2:23 pm
Newsgroups: sci.math
From: Chip Eastham <hardm...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:23:51 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Mar 10 2010 2:23 pm
Subject: Re: new numerical methods
On Mar 10, 11:09 am, arithmeticae <djes...@gmail.com> wrote:

> New numerical methods for computing roots at any convergence rate and by means of the most simple arithmetic:

> http://domingogomez.web.officelive.com/rm.aspx

> Regards,
> Domingo G.

Hi, Domingo:

The first paragraph of your write-up claims the
"well known mathematician Cauchy proved" what you
call Mr[V], "the Rational Mean of all elements of":

V = {a_1/b_1,...,a_n/b_n}

where all a_i's,b_i's are real and all b_i's have
the same sign:

Mr[V] = (SUM a_i)/(SUM b_i)

"always produces a mean value between a_1/b_1 and
a_n/b_n":

a_1/b_1 =< Mr[V] =< a_n/b_n

However this cannot be true (without imposing some
further conditions on elements in V or their ordering)
because it implies a_1/b_1 =< a_n/b_n.

regards, chip


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
arithmeticae  
View profile  
 More options Mar 10, 2:46 pm
Newsgroups: sci.math
From: arithmeticae <arithmo...@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:46:45 EST
Local: Wed, Mar 10 2010 2:46 pm
Subject: Re: new numerical methods
Hi Chip,

You are absolutely right, but the main point is that
the Rational Mean is always  a mean value between a_1/b_1
and a_n/b_n, no matter if  (a_1/b_1)  >= (a_n/b_n)
or (a_1/b_1)  <= (a_n/b_n).
I am fixing that bug which is the result of transferring my old webpages to this new officelive website.

Many thanks, Chip.


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Chip Eastham  
View profile  
 More options Mar 10, 3:27 pm
Newsgroups: sci.math
From: Chip Eastham <hardm...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:27:59 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Mar 10 2010 3:27 pm
Subject: Re: new numerical methods
On Mar 10, 1:46 pm, arithmeticae <arithmo...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Chip,

> You are absolutely right, but the main point is that
> the Rational Mean is always  a mean value between a_1/b_1
> and a_n/b_n, no matter if  (a_1/b_1)  >= (a_n/b_n)
> or (a_1/b_1)  <= (a_n/b_n).
> I am fixing that bug which is the result of transferring my old webpages to this new officelive website.

> Many thanks, Chip.

The look of your new officelive website is
clean and attractive.

Please consider the set V = {1/2, 3/1, 1/3},
all real and all denominators positive.  The
definition you gave is that the Rational Mean
is Mr[V] = 5/6.  This doesn't fall between 1/2
and 1/3, even if these numbers be transposed.

Perhaps what you want is to impose ascending
order on the elements of V.

regards, chip


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
arithmeticae  
View profile  
 More options Mar 10, 4:07 pm
Newsgroups: sci.math
From: arithmeticae <arithmo...@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:07:05 EST
Local: Wed, Mar 10 2010 4:07 pm
Subject: Re: new numerical methods
that's right, I included the following phrase right after you sent your first message :
"a set of values ordered according to their values (being a_1/b_1 < a_n/b_n).

Many thanks Chip


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2010 Google