Gmail Calendar Documents Web Reader more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
ATLANTA
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  2 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Sean  
View profile  
 More options Mar 10, 7:25 pm
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport.nascar
From: Sean <BOSSFA...@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:25:56 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Mar 10 2010 7:25 pm
Subject: ATLANTA
 Questions from the race:
1) Why did they stop counting laps after the Keselowski wreck? (If I
am correct, the graphic showed the laps to be down to three, then back
up to five).
2)  I know I should be ashamed, but I need a generic explanation on
the reason they institued the "wave around".

Observations:
 I was amazed of the  aero force that the wing actually
produces.Evidence of this is apparent in the replay of the Keselowski
wreck. As the car spins around and the rear starts to get airborne,
there is so much force on the wing surface that it actually bends
(changes the angle) of the wing. Maybe pie in the sky, but I wonder if
they designed  one side of the mounting bolts on the wing a lot
smaller, and secure the wing with a tether, much like the hoods.When a
car was going backwards, the "upforce" on the wing would cause the
bolts to snap,  causing the wing would come loose, and the "upforce"
would cease, Theoreticacally, this would keep the car from going
airborne.

NASCAR is playing with fire. We all want to see competitve races, and
there is nothing better than rivalries to stoke the fire, but by
slapping 99 on the wrist, they are implicitly giving the boys the
green light to get nasty. Most times frontier justice is OK- let the
boys police themselves. But-- do they really want to run the risk of a
PR disaster of epic proportions? If and when somebody takes a guy out
on purpose, and it results in serious injuries-----or worse? I think
99 should have been on fined, and credited with a 43rd place finish.
Three race probation? What in the world is that going to accomplish?
Dock him some points, and at least give the illusion of punishment by
keeping on probation until the 600.
Sean


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
TS02_05champ  
View profile  
 More options Mar 12, 12:26 pm
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport.nascar
From: TS02_05champ <tonystewart02_05ch...@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:56:32 +0430
Local: Fri, Mar 12 2010 12:26 pm
Subject: Re: ATLANTA

Sean wrote:
>  Questions from the race:
> 1) Why did they stop counting laps after the Keselowski wreck? (If I
> am correct, the graphic showed the laps to be down to three, then back
> up to five).

I wondered the same thing.

> 2)  I know I should be ashamed, but I need a generic explanation on
> the reason they institued the "wave around".

Since they now have a double file restart, those cars are waived around
so they can start in their correct (track wise) position.

    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2010 Google